Skip to content
Senior Living Liability

TL;DR

  • Washington provides a civil action for abuse or neglect of a vulnerable adult with recovery of attorney fees.
  • No general statutory cap on noneconomic damages is in force, so both ends of the loss distribution are supported.
  • King County carries both large continuing care campuses and a dense adult family home sector, which are almost unrelated risks.
  • Adult family homes are the segment most likely to be insured on a policy that excludes the rendering of care.

King County

King County senior care litigationfee shifting, no ceiling, and a very large small-home sector

King County Superior Court

Washington combines two features that rarely appear together: a vulnerable adult statute carrying attorney fees, and no durable ceiling above it. Fee shifting makes moderate claims economical to bring; the absence of a cap leaves the severe ones unconstrained.

King County is where both effects are largest, and it is also where the state's two very different care sectors sit side by side.

Last updated

What actually makes this venue what it is

Fee shifting under the vulnerable adult statute, which changes the economics of a claim that would be declined elsewhere and is the single most important legal fact about this state.

No general statutory ceiling on noneconomic damages, with constitutional decisions having constrained legislative attempts to impose one.

A two-tier market. Puget Sound carries large, long-established, frequently nonprofit continuing care campuses, and simultaneously one of the country's largest concentrations of licensed adult family homes caring for residents whose acuity elsewhere would put them in a licensed community.

A high-cost operating environment, which pressures staffing, which is where corporate negligence theories are built.

How this shows up in your renewal

Expect the abuse and neglect sublimit to be the central term, because the statutory route is how these claims are brought and it is the route most likely to attach to it.

Expect defense treatment to matter, since fee shifting sustains claims that would otherwise settle and cases run longer.

For adult family home operators, expect the market to be thin and the first question to be whether the policy covers care at all.

Seismic exposure is a genuine property question here, and earthquake coverage on a licensed care building with a percentage deductible against a code-compliant rebuild is a materially different purchase from earthquake on a warehouse.

What an operator in this county should actually do

Push the abuse and neglect sublimit toward the full policy limit. In a fee-shifting state with no ceiling, that sublimit is frequently the real limit.

Get defense outside the limit priced, and compare it properly: on an eroding limit in a venue where cases run long, the limit available at settlement is materially smaller than the number on the declarations page.

If you operate adult family homes, confirm in writing that the policy covers the rendering of care, naming the coverage part. This is the most common uninsured exposure in the segment.

Model the earthquake deductible as a dollar figure against current insured value, and confirm the ordinance or law increased cost of construction sublimit is realistic.

The law behind the venue

A venue decides how a case is run. The statutory route, the damages posture and the licensure framework are state law, and they are set out on the Washington page.

Washington senior care practice

Operators in this county ask

King County: common questions

What makes Washington different from Oregon?

They are similar in the important respect: both have a statutory abuse action with attorney fees and constitutional constraints on caps. Oregon adds enhanced damages under its vulnerable person statute. For an operator with beds in both, the program should be built for the pair rather than for one.

We run adult family homes. Is our policy adequate?

Ask two questions in writing. Does this policy cover a claim that we failed to provide adequate care, naming the coverage part. And is abuse and molestation covered or excluded, with the sublimit stated. Generic small commercial forms carrying a professional services exclusion are common in this segment and they exclude the only exposure that matters.

Does fee shifting really change our exposure that much?

It changes what gets filed. A claim with modest damages is uneconomical on a contingency alone and becomes viable when the statute pays the plaintiff attorney separately. That shows up in your loss run as a longer list of moderate claims, which prices as an aggregate problem rather than a per-occurrence one.

Go deeper

Free coverage review

Venue is priced into your renewal whether or not anyone explained it.

Send the declarations page and a specialist will tell you whether the tower and the structure fit the courthouse you actually operate in.