TL;DR
- Seven archetypes account for most senior care liability claims, and each sits somewhere specific on the general and professional liability boundary.
- Because so many of these claims allege both a premises failure and a care failure, a combined form from one market removes a coverage dispute between your own two insurers.
- Almost every one of these claims is built from records you produced, which is why documentation quality is a defensibility question rather than an administrative one.
Claims
What actually gets claimed. And which coverage answers it.
Senior care liability claims are not infinitely varied. A small number of archetypes account for most of them, and knowing which archetype you are looking at tells you which policy term is going to matter.
The single most useful structural observation is that many of these claims allege a premises failure and a care failure in the same complaint. That is why the boundary between general and professional liability is contested so often in this industry, and why splitting those two coverages between different carriers creates a dispute between your own insurers at the moment you most need a united defense.
Last updated
01
Falls
Every setting
Sits on the general and professional boundary
The highest-frequency serious claim in senior care. A fall complaint typically alleges both a premises condition and an inadequate fall risk assessment, which is exactly why a combined general and professional liability form matters: split the two coverages between different carriers and each has an incentive to call the claim the other one.
Read the full entry →02
Pressure injuries
Skilled nursing principally
Professional liability
Among the most litigated conditions in skilled nursing, because progression is documented in the record over time. A wound at one stage on admission and a more advanced stage later creates a visible timeline the defense has to explain interval by interval, which makes these claims expensive to defend regardless of merit.
Read the full entry →03
Medication errors
All settings, worst in assisted living
Professional liability
Omitted doses, wrong doses, wrong residents, and failures to monitor. The coverage question is usually straightforward. The exposure question is not, because in assisted living the delegation rules governing who may administer differ by state, and a claim that includes a regulatory violation is materially harder to defend.
Read the full entry →04
Elopement
Memory care principally
Professional liability, if the definition reaches supervision
Not a named peril. Coverage turns on whether the professional services definition includes supervision and the provision of a safe environment, and on whether a wandering or premises security exclusion has been attached. The claim itself is built from the facility own risk assessment and care plan.
Read the full entry →05
Resident on resident altercation
Memory care principally
Often captured by the assault and battery sublimit
In substance a professional liability claim about assessment, placement and supervision. In practice, many assault and battery endorsements apply to any claim arising out of assault or battery regardless of how it is pleaded, which pulls the claim to the sublimit anyway.
Read the full entry →06
Abuse allegations
Every setting
Sublimited, frequently with its own aggregate
The claim type that produces the largest verdicts and the most publicity in this industry, and almost never covered at the full policy limit. Frequently pleaded alongside negligent hiring, supervision and retention counts that the endorsement wording may capture anyway.
Read the full entry →07
Wrongful death and survival
Every setting
Two distinct claims, two damages models
A survival action is the claim the resident would have had, carried on by the estate. A wrongful death action belongs to the surviving family. State law decides which exists and what damages each allows, and elder abuse statutes in several states preserve pre-death suffering that ordinary survival law would extinguish.
Read the full entry →
The thing they have in common
The record is the case.
A senior care claim is not reconstructed from witness memory. It is assembled from the medical record, the staffing sheets, the care plans, the incident reports and, increasingly, the electronic timestamps on call systems and door alarms. All of that is yours, and all of it is discoverable.
That has two consequences worth taking seriously. It makes these claims expensive to defend even when they are ultimately defended successfully, which is why defense treatment and retention erosion decide what a year of claims costs you. And it means the highest-return risk work is not a coverage change at all: it is accurate, contemporaneous, complete documentation, which improves defensibility now and improves loss development, and therefore pricing, over the following years.
Go deeper
Go deeper on the specific clauses and decisions that show up most.
Authoritative references
Primary regulatory sources
- CMS, 42 CFR Part 483: Requirements for States and Long Term Care Facilities
The federal requirements a certified skilled nursing facility operates under, including resident rights, quality of care, infection control, and resident personal funds.
- CMS, guidance for laws and regulations, survey and certification
How the survey process works, how deficiencies are scoped and cited, and what enforcement follows.
- NAIC consumer information
Neutral reference on insurance terms, admitted and surplus lines status, and state regulation.
Free coverage review
Which of these has your program actually been built for?
Send the declarations page and tell us your settings. A specialist returns an item-by-item read within one business day.