TL;DR
Line of coverage
Auto is usually the smallest line on a senior care program and the one reviewed least carefully. A community with one bus and two vans looks like a modest fleet exposure, and priced as a fleet exposure it is modest.
Two things make it larger than it looks. The passengers are frail, so an accident that would produce soft tissue claims in a general population produces fractures, hospitalizations and deaths here. And the fleet is not the whole exposure: the moment a staff member uses a personal car for anything work-related, the operator has an exposure with no vehicle on any schedule.
Last updated
Who this applies to
Every operator that transports residents, and every operator whose staff run errands, make bank deposits, or drive between locations. Home care agencies carry the largest non-owned exposure in the industry because their entire delivery model is employees driving personal vehicles.
01
Commercial auto liability covers bodily injury and property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance or use of a covered auto, including vehicles you own, hire or borrow depending on the symbols selected on the declarations page.
Those symbols are the whole coverage question and almost nobody reads them. They determine whether the policy reaches owned autos only, or also hired autos, also non-owned autos, and whether the definition is broad enough to pick up a vehicle acquired mid-term.
Physical damage coverage on the vehicles themselves is separate and comparatively unimportant, since a bus is a replaceable asset and the liability is not.
Non-owned and hired auto liability extends the policy to vehicles the operator does not own, principally employee personal vehicles used for work. It generally responds excess of the employee own personal auto policy.
Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage matters more than usual here, because a resident injured by another driver with inadequate limits is still your resident and still your reputational event.
02
Loading and unloading is care rather than driving. Assisting a resident with a walker onto a lift, securing a wheelchair, or steadying someone on the steps is an activity that produces falls, and a fall during that process may be a professional liability claim rather than an auto claim, or both. Which policy responds turns on facts nobody establishes in advance.
Passenger severity is structural. Frail occupants with osteoporosis, on anticoagulants, with limited ability to brace, produce serious injuries from moderate impacts.
Wheelchair securement is a specific and recurring failure mode with its own standards and its own litigation.
Driver qualification is uneven. Community buses are frequently driven by activities staff or maintenance staff rather than by professional drivers, and motor vehicle record checking is inconsistent.
Home care is the outlier. An agency with no vehicles at all can have hundreds of employees driving personal cars to client homes every day, entirely on non-owned coverage, with the agency exposed to every one of those trips.
Volunteer drivers, common in nonprofit and faith-based settings, sit in an awkward category that many policies do not clearly address.
03
Non-owned and hired auto simply absent. It is cheap, it is easy to add, and its absence is the most common auto gap in this industry.
Symbols selected for owned autos only, leaving hired and non-owned outside the grant regardless of what anyone assumed.
Limits set at a level appropriate for property damage rather than for a multi-passenger injury event. One vehicle carrying eight frail residents is a severity exposure, not a fender-bender exposure.
No umbrella or excess sitting over auto, or an umbrella that excludes auto.
Employee personal auto policies with minimum limits and no verification, so the non-owned coverage sits excess of almost nothing.
No coordination between the auto and professional liability policies on a loading or unloading injury, so both carriers can plausibly point at the other.
Volunteer drivers unaddressed in the policy definitions.
04
Read the covered auto symbols on the declarations page and confirm they include hired and non-owned. This is a two-minute check with a large consequence.
Add non-owned and hired auto if it is missing. For a home care agency it is not optional, it is the primary auto exposure.
Size the liability limit against a multi-passenger event rather than against the value of the vehicle, and confirm the umbrella sits over auto without an exclusion.
Run motor vehicle records on everyone who drives a community vehicle, on a documented schedule rather than at hire only, and set a written standard for what disqualifies.
Require evidence of personal auto insurance from employees who drive for work, with a stated minimum limit, and re-verify it annually. Without that, your non-owned coverage is sitting excess of a policy that may not exist.
Train and document wheelchair securement and resident loading as clinical procedures, because that is how they will be characterized in a claim.
Ask both carriers how a resident fall during loading would be handled, and get the coordination answer in writing.
Follow-up questions
Almost certainly yes, in the form of non-owned and hired auto. If any employee ever drives their own car to make a bank deposit, collect supplies, travel between your locations or visit a client, you have an exposure with no vehicle on any schedule. For home care agencies this is the largest auto exposure they have.
It is genuinely arguable, which is the problem. Loading and unloading assistance is both use of the vehicle and delivery of care, so both policies are plausibly implicated and each may point at the other. Notice it to both, and ask both, in advance, how they would treat it.
It is the first layer and it is frequently inadequate. Personal auto policies carry limits that would not survive a serious injury, and a plaintiff will name your organization because that is where the money is. Non-owned coverage sits above the employee policy, which is why verifying that the employee policy exists at a stated minimum actually matters.
Size it against the worst realistic event, which is a multi-passenger injury involving frail occupants, rather than against the vehicle value. Then confirm the umbrella attaches over auto. This site publishes ranges rather than quotes, and the right number depends on your passenger counts, routes and state, which is what a proper review establishes.
Go deeper
Other lines of coverage
The line that usually costs a senior care operator the most, where the experience modifier compounds year over year and resident handling drives the claim profile.
Coverage for governance decisions rather than resident harm, including the Side A component that responds when the organization cannot indemnify.
The packaged small-business policy many small senior care operators are sold, and the professional services exclusion that removes the only coverage that matters.
Coverage for claims by employees rather than residents, where wage and hour exposure across a large hourly workforce usually dominates everything else.
Coverage for a breach of resident health information and for the operational shutdown a ransomware event causes in a building where care cannot pause.
Property coverage for a licensed care building, where valuation, code upgrade cost and the displacement of residents matter more than the fire itself.
Employee dishonesty and the specific exposure created by holding money that belongs to residents, where a modest theft becomes a regulatory and reputational event.
Course of construction coverage for new senior housing and, more commonly, for renovation and expansion of an occupied licensed building.
Coverage for mechanical and electrical failure that the standard property form excludes, on equipment that in a care setting keeps residents alive rather than comfortable.
Free coverage review
Send the declarations page and five years of loss runs. A specialist reads this line against the rest of the structure and tells you where the gaps actually are, within one business day.