TL;DR
- Removing the building removes some exposures and adds others. The care is still professional liability, but you do not control the premises, staff drive constantly, and supervision happens through documentation rather than observation.
- These are the questions home care and home health agencies ask most often.
Home care · 6 answers
Home Care and Home Health Insurance FAQ
Coverage for this setting in full is on the home care page.
Last updated
- Open this answer on its own page →
Yes, and this is the coverage most often missing in this segment. Caregivers drive personal vehicles to clients, between clients, and often with clients in the car for appointments and errands.
When there is an accident, the caregiver personal policy responds first and the agency sits above it. Personal limits are frequently minimal, and a claim involving an injured elderly passenger is not a minimal claim.
Add hired and non-owned auto liability. It is inexpensive relative to what it addresses, and confirm your driver qualification and motor vehicle record checking practice matches what the policy assumes, because a mismatch there is a common declination point after a loss.
- Open this answer on its own page →
Property damage you cause in the course of providing care is ordinarily a general liability matter, and that part is usually straightforward.
The harder exposure is allegations of theft. A caregiver working alone in a client home, often with a client who has cognitive impairment, is structurally exposed to accusation whether or not anything was taken. That is a crime coverage question and a reputational one, and general liability does not answer either.
The controls that matter are procedural: a written policy on handling client money and valuables, a prohibition on accepting gifts, documented client property inventories where appropriate, and a clear reporting path. Those protect the caregiver as much as the agency.
- Open this answer on its own page →
From the documentation, because in home care the documentation is not just a record of the care, it is the only evidence of it. Nobody observed the visit.
A claim alleging that a caregiver missed a change in condition, or was not competent for the assigned task, is answered from the care plan, the visit notes, the competency assessment and the supervisory visit record. Agencies that keep those thinly have very little to work with.
Make the supervisory visit a real recorded event with a defined cadence and a recorded outcome, document competency at hire and on assignment change, and maintain a clear escalation path for reporting a change in condition. Underwriters ask for exactly these, so the work improves both defensibility and price.
- Open this answer on its own page →
Because it arises from how the work is structured rather than from anything a manager did. Travel time between clients, documentation completed after a visit ends, on-call arrangements, and misclassification of coordinators as exempt each apply uniformly to everyone in a role.
That uniformity is what turns one complaint into a collective action. A discrimination claim is about one person; a rounding practice is about everyone who ever clocked in.
Most employment practices policies exclude wage and hour damages and give back only a modest defense sublimit, so the insurance funds a first response rather than a solution. Audit timekeeping practice before a claim: whether travel time is captured and paid, whether post-visit documentation time is recorded, and whether every exempt classification can be defended on actual duties rather than job title.
- Open this answer on its own page →
Whether an agency is a covered entity depends on the services it provides and how it bills, and that determination is worth getting from counsel rather than assuming either way.
The practical exposure is similar regardless. A home care agency holds health information, addresses, schedules showing when a client is alone, and frequently financial and identity information about a population that is a preferred target for fraud. Notification obligations under HIPAA are triggered by a breach itself rather than by any resulting harm, so the cost arrives whether or not anyone is defrauded, and it scales with record count.
Two things to check on a cyber policy beyond the headline limit: whether business interruption covers the loss when a scheduling or records system is unavailable, and whether vendor and business associate exposure is covered, since most healthcare breaches originate with a third party.
- Open this answer on its own page →
Frequently yes, and worker classification is contested territory in this industry. A plaintiff will argue whichever characterization reaches the agency, and a regulator may reach its own conclusion about classification for wage and tax purposes independently.
On the insurance side, confirm your policy covers your liability arising from the acts of independent contractors. Liability forms distinguish employees, who are generally insureds, from contractors, who generally are not, and the treatment of the agency own liability arising from contractor acts varies by form.
If contractors carry their own coverage, collect and read the actual endorsements rather than filing certificates unread, and confirm the additional insured endorsement names your current entity. A certificate is evidence, not coverage.
Free coverage review
These are the general answers. Yours is in your policy.
Send the declarations page and a specialist returns an item-by-item read within one business day.