Question
Does a single-community operator need excess liability at all?
Short answer
Usually yes, because the size of a senior care claim is set by the injury and the venue rather than by the size of the operator, and a first excess layer is one of the cheapest limits available per dollar of protection, particularly in states with no cap on noneconomic damages.
The mismatch that makes this necessary
Premium scales with beds. Claims do not. A single wrongful death claim arising from a fall or an elopement is valued on the injury, the venue and the quality of the documentary record, none of which are functions of how many buildings you run.
That mismatch means the smallest operators have the largest gap between the limit they carry and the claim they could face, and they are also the operators least able to absorb the difference.
How cheap the first layer usually is
Excess layers price on the probability of reaching the layer, so each successive layer costs less than the one below it. The first layer above a primary limit is usually a small fraction of the primary premium for the same amount of limit.
The practical implication is that a small operator can often double or triple the total limit for a modest increase in total spend, and that comparison is a far better use of renewal effort than shaving the primary premium.
Ask for the tower priced in layers rather than as a package so you can see the marginal cost of each one. That single request changes how the decision looks.
Where the state answer differs
In states with no statutory cap on noneconomic damages, and particularly those with a fee-shifting resident rights statute, the tail of possible outcomes is long and a thin tower is a genuine solvency risk. In states with a firm cap on the noneconomic component the tail is shorter, though defense cost and economic damages are not capped.
This is one of the few places where the state guide should change the purchase decision rather than only inform it. Read your state before setting the limit.
The two structural checks before you buy
Confirm the excess is follow-form over the professional liability, including the abuse coverage part, and confirm it schedules the professional policy as underlying. An excess bought as a generic umbrella frequently does neither, and then it does not respond to the claim you bought it for.
Confirm the attachment language. If it attaches on exhaustion of the underlying limit by payment of damages, and your primary erodes by defense, there is a gap between the two that you fund. Ask for attachment on exhaustion by payment of damages and claim expenses.
Primary sources
Sources and references
This answer draws on the following regulatory, statutory, and standards-body sources. Coverage availability and program structure also depend on market appetite and underwriter discretion not captured by these sources.
- NAIC, commercial lines consumer informationhttps://content.naic.org/consumer.htm
Related practice areas
Insurance clauses in this area
Related questions
Have a more specific question?
A specialist will reach out by the end of the day.
Request a free coverage reviewLast updated