Question
What happens at mediation in a senior care case?
Short answer
A neutral mediator moves between separate rooms trying to close the gap between a plaintiff demand anchored on a life care plan or a wrongful death valuation and a defense evaluation anchored on liability weaknesses, and what moves the number is the quality of your documentary record, the venue, and whether the person with settlement authority is actually present.
The structure of the day
Parties are placed in separate rooms. The mediator meets each side, hears the case, then shuttles offers and arguments between them. Joint sessions are increasingly rare in these cases because they tend to harden positions.
Expect it to take most of a day and expect the meaningful movement to happen late. Early numbers on both sides are positioning. The negotiation that matters usually starts in the final quarter of the day, which is why leaving early is expensive.
What each side brings
The plaintiff brings a demand built from the economic damages, often a life care plan or a wrongful death valuation, plus a noneconomic number anchored to verdicts in that venue, and a narrative built from your own records.
The defense brings a liability evaluation, comparative fault arguments, causation arguments about pre-existing conditions, and its own damages analysis. The strongest defense material is almost always documentary: a complete chart, a documented assessment, and evidence the care plan was followed.
The mediator brings a view of what similar cases resolve for in that courthouse. That number carries more weight than either side expects and it is why venue drives outcomes so heavily in this class.
Who has to be in the room
Someone with actual settlement authority for the operator, not someone who has to call for approval, because a decision maker on the phone stalls the endgame. The claims professional for each carrier layer that could be reached, since a case that pierces the primary needs the excess carrier engaged and present.
And an operator representative who knows the facility. Cases settle better when the defense side can answer operational questions immediately rather than deferring them.
The eroding limit problem at mediation
If your policy pays defense inside the limit, then every month the case does not settle reduces the money available to settle it. A defense that runs for two more years to improve the outcome can leave less limit than an earlier settlement would have required.
That arithmetic is uncomfortable and it belongs on the table explicitly. Ask for the current limit remaining, not the original limit, before evaluating any number. Operators frequently negotiate against a limit that no longer exists.
Primary sources
Sources and references
This answer draws on the following regulatory, statutory, and standards-body sources. Coverage availability and program structure also depend on market appetite and underwriter discretion not captured by these sources.
- NAIC, property and casualty consumer informationhttps://content.naic.org/consumer.htm
Related practice areas
Insurance clauses in this area
Related questions
Have a more specific question?
A specialist will reach out by the end of the day.
Request a free coverage reviewLast updated