Question
What do we do if no carrier will offer abuse coverage?
Short answer
Three real options exist: buy a standalone abuse and molestation policy from a market that writes it separately, accept a sublimit far below the policy limit and buy a dedicated excess layer above it, or fund the exposure yourself, and only the first two are appropriate for an operator that cannot absorb a seven-figure loss.
Why this happens
Abuse claims are the highest-severity category in senior care and one of the least predictable. After a claim, or in a segment the market is retreating from, a carrier will sometimes quote the account only with abuse excluded, which is a decline dressed as a quote.
It also happens to new operators with no loss history and to small residential care homes written on generic small commercial paper, where abuse exclusion is the default rather than a reaction to anything.
Option one: a standalone abuse policy
A separate market writes abuse and molestation liability as a monoline product, primarily for human services organizations, schools and care providers. It can sit alongside a professional liability program that excludes the exposure.
The things to check are whether it is claims-made with a retroactive date matching your professional policy, whether it covers negligent hiring and supervision as well as the act itself, whether defense is inside or outside the limit, and how it coordinates with the professional policy so that a claim pleading both abuse and negligent care does not fall between them.
Option two: a sublimit plus a dedicated excess
Where the primary offers a small sublimit rather than a total exclusion, a dedicated excess layer over that sublimit is often available, sometimes from a different market than the primary.
The critical check is attachment. The excess has to attach at the sublimit, not at the full policy limit, and it has to define exhaustion in terms that your primary sublimit can actually satisfy. This is the most common error in this structure and it produces a layer that can never be reached.
What changes the answer at the next renewal
Abuse coverage is underwritten on controls more than on loss history, which means it is one of the few coverages an operator can genuinely buy back through documented risk management.
The controls that matter: criminal background screening at hire and periodically thereafter, reference verification actually performed, a written policy on one-to-one care and on personal care privacy, a reporting mechanism that does not run through the accused supervisor, documented training with sign-in records, and evidence that prior allegations were investigated and reported to the state within required timeframes.
Assemble that packet and present it as a submission exhibit rather than answering a questionnaire. Operators who do this frequently move from excluded to sublimited, and from sublimited toward full limit, over two or three renewals.
Primary sources
Sources and references
This answer draws on the following regulatory, statutory, and standards-body sources. Coverage availability and program structure also depend on market appetite and underwriter discretion not captured by these sources.
- CMS, 42 CFR 483.12, freedom from abuse, neglect and exploitationhttps://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/chapter-IV/subchapter-G/part-483
Related practice areas
Insurance clauses in this area
Related questions
Have a more specific question?
A specialist will reach out by the end of the day.
Request a free coverage reviewLast updated