Question
What share of revenue should insurance be for a senior living operator?
Short answer
There is no single defensible benchmark, because the same operator moving from one state to another can see the liability line change materially with no change in operations, which means a percentage of revenue comparison across operators mostly measures where the beds are and what limit is carried rather than how well the program is bought.
Why the benchmark misleads
Three variables dominate the number and none of them are efficiency. Care setting, because skilled nursing and memory care carry materially higher rates per bed than independent living. State and venue, because claim environment drives severity pricing. And program structure, because an operator carrying a large tower with defense outside the limit will spend more than one carrying a thin tower with defense inside it, and the second one is worse protected rather than better managed.
An operator comparing its percentage against a peer without normalizing for those three is comparing two different questions.
What to compare instead
Total cost of risk rather than premium. That means premium plus retained losses plus collateral cost plus claims administration plus the internal cost of risk management. An operator that reduced premium by raising the retention has not reduced cost of risk; it has moved it into a less visible line.
Then compare cost of risk per occupied bed per year, segmented by care setting, and track your own number over time. Your own trend is the only comparison that controls for the variables that matter.
And compare structure explicitly: defense inside or outside, abuse sublimit as a share of limit, aggregate basis, and total limit. Two operators with the same percentage of revenue can be buying very different things.
How to use the number with a board or a lender
Present it as three lines rather than one: premium, expected retained loss, and everything else. That framing makes a retention increase visible as a transfer rather than as a saving, which is the conversation most boards are not having.
Then show the limit alongside it. A board approving an insurance budget without seeing the limit is approving a cost without seeing what it bought, and the limit is the number that decides whether a bad year is survivable.
The direction the number is moving
Liability cost per bed in this sector has been rising faster than revenue per bed for several years, driven by claim severity rather than by frequency. That means the percentage of revenue is drifting upward across the sector, and an operator whose percentage held flat may simply have bought less protection.
Read a flat line with suspicion. Check whether the limit, the abuse sublimit or the defense treatment changed in the years the percentage held steady.
Primary sources
Sources and references
This answer draws on the following regulatory, statutory, and standards-body sources. Coverage availability and program structure also depend on market appetite and underwriter discretion not captured by these sources.
- NAIC, property and casualty market share and premium datahttps://content.naic.org/research-actuarial
Related practice areas
Insurance clauses in this area
Related questions
Have a more specific question?
A specialist will reach out by the end of the day.
Request a free coverage reviewLast updated