Skip to content
Senior Living Liability

Question

Should we talk to the family after a serious incident?

Short answer

Yes, and quickly, because the most common reason families retain counsel is that nobody explained what happened, but the conversation should be a factual disclosure and an expression of sympathy rather than an admission of fault, and you should know whether your state apology statute protects only sympathy or also protects statements of fault.

What actually drives families to lawyers

The research on why patients and families sue is consistent across settings: the decision is driven far more by a perceived lack of honesty and a lack of communication than by the severity of the injury itself. Families who feel informed and respected pursue litigation less often than families who feel handled.

In senior living the effect is amplified because the family relationship is ongoing. The people you stop talking to still have a parent in your building, and their sense of what happened is being formed by silence.

What the apology statutes do

A majority of states have enacted apology statutes making expressions of sympathy, condolence or benevolence inadmissible in a subsequent civil action. A smaller number extend protection to statements of fault or error.

That distinction is the whole practical question. In a sympathy-only state, saying we are so sorry this happened is protected while saying we should have checked on him sooner is admissible. Know which kind of state you are in before the conversation, and brief your administrators on it rather than leaving it to instinct.

How to run the conversation

Do it early, in person, with the administrator or director of nursing present rather than delegated down. Say what is known, say plainly what is not yet known, and commit to a specific follow-up with a date.

Express sympathy without characterizing fault. Do not speculate about cause, do not blame a staff member, and do not describe the internal review as having found anything before it has concluded.

Document that the conversation happened, who attended and what was said, in a factual note. A documented, prompt, respectful disclosure is a good fact at trial. An undocumented one gets remembered differently by each side.

When to involve the carrier first

Most policies contain a condition prohibiting the insured from voluntarily assuming an obligation or making a payment without consent. Expressing sympathy and disclosing facts is not assuming an obligation. Offering to waive charges, pay funeral costs or fund anything is, and doing it without consent can prejudice coverage.

So the sequence is: talk to the family about what happened, and talk to the carrier before offering anything. Where the incident is serious, notice it as a circumstance the same week, which also puts a claims professional beside you for the conversations that follow.

Primary sources

Sources and references

This answer draws on the following regulatory, statutory, and standards-body sources. Coverage availability and program structure also depend on market appetite and underwriter discretion not captured by these sources.

Related practice areas

Insurance clauses in this area

Related questions

Have a more specific question?

A specialist will reach out by the end of the day.

Request a free coverage review

Last updated

Free coverage review

A specialist will reach out by the end of the day.

No marketing sequences, no list rental.