TL;DR
Cost
The economics of insuring a small licensed care home are genuinely difficult, and operators are right to feel that the per-bed number looks unfair. Minimum premiums, fixed programme costs and the absence of credible loss data all land on very few beds.
That pressure is exactly why this segment has the highest rate of programmes that would not answer a care claim at all. A cheaper policy was available, it was bought, and nobody checked what it excluded.
Last updated
Rated on
Per occupied bed, per year, with minimum premiums that fall on very few beds.
General and professional liability, per occupied bed per year
$900 to $5.5K
Typical programmes at 6 to 16 beds
Small operators often pay a high per-bed rate because they lack scale, and frequently start from a general business policy that would not answer a care claim at all.
A span the market produces across the country, not a benchmark and not a quote. The width is the state effect, not uncertainty about any one building.
Minimum premium, which dominates at this size. Below a certain bed count the rate per bed is mostly an artefact of the floor rather than a judgment about the risk.
Acuity, which in small homes is frequently higher than the category suggests. In several states the small-home licence carries residents who would be in a licensed assisted living community elsewhere.
Overnight staffing, and specifically whether there is one caregiver awake or one asleep on premises. This is the fact pattern behind most serious claims in this setting and underwriters ask about it directly.
Whether abuse and molestation is included or excluded. At this size it is commonly excluded outright, which is a coverage question before it is a price question.
The number of homes under common ownership. Moving from one house to three changes the conversation, because the programme starts to have scale and a loss history worth rating.
State, as everywhere.
Liability only. Property on the house, workers compensation, non-owned auto if anyone transports residents, and crime if you hold resident funds all sit outside it.
An umbrella or excess layer, which a small operator most needs and least often buys. The first excess layer is usually a small fraction of the primary premium for the same amount of limit, and it is the cheapest protection available at this size.
Abuse coverage where it has been excluded from the primary and has to be bought separately.
Honestly, at this size, less than an operator would like. Minimum premiums do not negotiate away and the levers that work for large operators, loss rating and retention structure, mostly do not apply.
What does work: presenting the operation properly. A one-page description of the house, the licence category, the acuity you accept, the overnight staffing model, and the admission and retention criteria will price better than a bare application, because at this size the underwriter has almost nothing else to go on.
Background screening and training documentation, which is what moves abuse from excluded to sublimited.
Growing. Three homes under one programme price better per bed than three separate policies, and that is one of the few structural advantages available in this segment.
What does not work, and is actively dangerous: buying on price without reading the professional services exclusion. Ask two questions in writing before anything else. Does this policy cover a claim that we failed to provide adequate care, naming the coverage part. And is abuse and molestation covered or excluded, with the sublimit stated.
Cost questions
Minimum premiums and fixed programme costs divide across six to sixteen beds instead of a hundred, and you have too few beds to generate credible loss data, so you are class rated on the segment rather than loss rated on yourself. It is a scale problem rather than a judgment about your operation.
Possibly, and it is worth finding out rather than assuming either way. Small commercial forms sold into this segment frequently carry a professional services exclusion, which removes the only exposure that matters, and frequently exclude abuse outright. A policy that excludes both is cheaper for a reason.
Usually yes. Claim value is set by the injury and the venue rather than by operator size, so a wrongful death claim against a six-bed home is valued like any other. Excess layers price on the probability of being reached, so the first layer is comparatively inexpensive. Ask for the tower priced layer by layer and look at the marginal cost.
Go deeper
Cost by other settings
Per occupied bed, per year, then loss rated above a certain size.
Per occupied bed or unit, per year.
Per occupied bed, per year, loaded above the assisted living band.
Blended per unit across levels of care, with governance lines priced separately against the entrance fee obligation.
Per unit, closer to habitational real estate than to licensed care, with a professional liability component that is often absent and should not be.
Payroll and revenue, not beds. Rating follows the workforce and the service scope rather than a building.
Free coverage review
Send the declarations page and five years of loss runs. A specialist tells you where in the range you actually sit and what is moving you there, within one business day.